Opposition calls for independent Muskrat Falls study

A government commissioned report endorsing the Muskrat Falls hydro-electric project has opposition leaders renewing their call for an independent study.

The Dalton report, released Thursday, states building a subsea transmission link to Newfoundland is the most cost-efficient solution to Nova Scotia’s future energy needs.

“What we need is an independent review,” said Liberal leader Stephen McNeil following the document’s release. “We need the Utility and Review Board to have the time to analyze these projects so that all Nova Scotians can feel some comfort that there has been truly an independent analysis.”

The report says securing power from Muskrat Falls would cost $402 million less than a deal with Hydro-Quebec, and $1.5 billion less than using a mix of wind and natural gas over the 35-year life of the commercial contract for the hydro-electric development.

However the report was paid for by Nova Scotia’s New Democratic government and used data supplied by energy giant Emera, both of which have a stake in building the project.

Energy expert John Dalton admits there was no consultation with Hydro-Quebec and it is not known whether the utility would give Nova Scotia a discounted rate on power.

“I don’t think it would be too much to ask, for someone who is looking at something which is essentially tying Nova Scotia electricity users to a 35-year deal, to have picked up the phone and called Hydro-Quebec,” said McNeil.

The report also lacks data on the effect the Muskrat Falls proejct might have on N.S. ratepayers.

Progressive Conservative leader Jamie Baillie argues the province has made no progress with this study because there are no hard numbers for customers.

“Here’s the key question,” said Baillie. “How much will that power cost when it comes to our homes? That wasn’t answered, and until we know that answer it is irresponsible to sign on the dotted line for such a big project.”